Saturday, 24 February 2024, marks a milestone for Australian trade mark registrations. Amendment to s.93(2) of the Trade Marks Act provided that applications for cancellation of a trade mark registration for non-use under s. 92(4)(b) may only be filed after three years from the date the particulars of the trade mark were “entered into the Register”. Prior to the …
>> Read more
The owner of the popular ‘House’ stores, engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct when it took part of Bed Bath ‘N’ Table’s branding for its new homewares store, the Federal Court has found. In Bed Bath ‘N’ Table v Global Retail Brands Australia[1] , Justice Rofe found that GRBA’s decision to brand its soft homewares …
>> Read more
Acronyms and initialisms and are frequently used by businesses to make their names more memorable and to distinguish themselves from competitors. Recently, the global fast food chain Kentucky Fried Chicken opposed an application by Grill’d seeking registration of its HFC mark (see decision in KFC THC V Ltd v Grill’d IP Pty Ltd [2023] ATMO …
>> Read more
McDonald’s trade mark registration for BIG MAC is not infringed by Hungry Jack’s use of the mark BIG JACK according to the Federal Court of Australia decision in McD Asia Pacific LLC v Hungry Jack’s Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1412. Hungry Jack’s began promoting its BIG JACK burger in March 2020. An example of Hungry …
>> Read more
Trade mark squatting, where a person registers a trade mark merely to sell for a profit at a later time, is a big issue in China and a headache for many brand owners. It doesn’t occur as frequently in Australia largely due to our first to use regime which differs from China’s first to file …
>> Read more
An uptick in trade mark applications for virtual goods and services as consumers look to the metaverse to buy luxury products and enjoy virtual experiences illustrates how societal trends can influence trade mark filings. This is no surprise given Metaverse Fashion Week is now an annual event featuring big brands such as Coach, Adidas and …
>> Read more
The importance of conducting clearance searches prior to launching a new brand or product line has again been highlighted by the decision in The Agency v H.A.S Real Estate. Ultimately the court found that HAS had not infringed The Agency’s trade marks due to a lack of sufficient similarity between the signs as registered and …
>> Read more
The burden on parties seeking an extension of time to file evidence in trade mark oppositions has been lowered effective 31 July 2023 following an Official Notice issued by IP Australia. The Trade Marks Regulations provide a basis for extensions of time where a party can show that despite making all reasonable efforts to comply …
>> Read more
The Republic of Peru has appealed a decision from the Australian Trade Marks Office to refuse to grant the country trade mark rights to the word pisco. The Peruvians sought to register the sign PISCO in Australia by filing an application in 2019. The trade mark examiner refused to accept the mark for registration, so …
>> Read more
American popstar Katy Perry recently lost a trade mark infringement dispute[1] filed in 2019 by Sydney-based fashion designer Katie Taylor. The battle of the Katies started more than 15 years ago: Australian Katie Taylor, born Katie Jane Perry (The Designer) started designing and selling clothes under the brand KATIE PERRY in 2007 and filed a trade …
>> Read more
