The decision of Gordon J in LED Technologies Pty Ltd v Elecspess Pty Ltd[2008] FCA 1941 (handed down in December last year but only recently available) provides food for thought on a number of issues arising under theDesigns Act 2003.
The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) has changed the way that patent details for all Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications entering New Zealand national phase are captured. From December 2008, patent details for all national phase applications will be copied from the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) database. The change in process means …
>> Read more
Justice Virginia Margaret Bell (currently of the NSW Supreme Court) has been named as a Justice of the High Court of Australia, with effect from 3 February 2009. She will be the 48th person, and the fourth woman (and the third on the current court), appointed to the High Court since federation in 1901. She …
>> Read more
Last Friday the High Court refused to grant special leave to appeal from the Full Federal Court decision in Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag [2008] FCAFC 121. The transcript of the special leave hearing can be found here. In relation to the Full Court’s finding that despite claim 1 being incorporated …
>> Read more
On 5 July 2006 Review 2 Pty Ltd was registered as the owner of Design Registration No. 307708 in relation to ladies garments (“the Review Design”). This case considered whether Redberry Enterprise Pty Ltd (“Redberry”) infringed the Review Design and considered Redberry’s cross-claim that the Review Design was invalid. Kenny J found that the Review …
>> Read more
While Australia has had a new Designs Act for over four years now, the previous Designs Act 1906 still has a significant role to play in respect of designs registered under that act. Caroma Industries Ltd v Technicon Industries Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1465 illustrates the breadth of the infringement provisions of the 1906 Act. …
>> Read more
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has shut down the ‘Designer Brand Outlet’ website. The ACCC alleged that false, misleading and deceptive representations were made on the website and that some of the clothes supplied were counterfeit copies. The ACCC release is here.
The Full Federal Court has allowed the appeal in Chiropedic Bedding Pty Ltd v Radburg Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 142, overturning the decision of the trial judge and holding that a furniture fair involving 250 Australian exhibitors and seven from New Zealand was an “international exhibition”. Section 47(1) provides that the fact that a design, …
>> Read more
Allen Hardware Products Pty Ltd v Tclip Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 8, saw delegate Herald consider an application by Tclip for revocation of certain registered designs in the name of Allen Hardware on the basis of lack of entitlement. The delegate considered that principles relating to inventorship under the Patents Act should be applied to …
>> Read more
